The concept of self-publishing both fascinates and terrifies
me.
I have come to terms with the very real possibility that no
matter how hard I work or how much I revise or query, I might never land an
agent. And even if I do, that might not translate into a book deal.
And if that is the case, I can’t decide what I would do. Trunk
my novel and write another one? How do I know if this is ‘the one’? What if I
think this isn’t ‘the one,’ so I write another book, and it’s even less of ‘the
one’ than the first?! If I feel good about my book but I can’t find a home for
it, should I self-publish?
I’m a very analytical/research oriented person. I comb blogs
and websites, looking for little nuggets of information to store away that I
can use later (yanno, once I finish revising my book). I’ve giggled my way
through Evil Editor posts, cringed at the poor souls who needed a shot with the
clue gun in the Snarkives, and read everything Mr. Nathan Bransford has ever
been gracious enough to share about the agent/publishing world. And I’ve come
to realize there is no ‘right’ or ‘good’ answer to the best way to publish a
book.
Self-publishing sounds not just difficult (although I’ve
never given up on something just because it’s difficult), but like it involves
a set of skills that I just do not possess and do not feel comfortable trying
to locate via the internet. Clearly many authors have done it (finding varying
degrees of success).
But I don’t know if it’s really right for me.
I'm still on the fence with this one as well. There are so many pro's and con's to both tradition and self-publishing that I'm not sure which direction is best or even if one truly is better than the other.
ReplyDelete